Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Science and Curation Considerations for the Design of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility

Brandi Lee Carrier 1 David Beaty 1 Aurore Hutzler 2 Alvin Smith 1 Gerhard Kminek 2 Michael Meyer 3 Timothy Haltigin 4 Lindsay Hays 3 Carl Agee 5 Henner Busemann 6 Barbara Cavalazzi 7 Charles Cockell 8 Vinciane Debaille 9 Daniel Glavin 10 Monica Grady 11 Ernst Hauber 12 Bernard Marty 13 Francis Mccubbin 14 Lisa Pratt 15 Aaron Regberg 14 Caroline Smith 16, 17 Roger Summons 18 Timothy Swindle 19 Kimberly Tait 20 Nicholas Tosca 21 Arya Udry 22 Tomohiro Usui 23 Michael Velbel 24, 25 Meenakshi Wadhwa 26, 1 Frances Westall 27 Maria-Paz Zorzano 28 
Abstract : The most important single element of the "ground system" portion of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign is a facility referred to as the Sample Receiving Facility (SRF), which would need to be designed and equipped to receive the returned spacecraft, extract and open the sealed sample container, extract the samples from the sample tubes, and implement a set of evaluations and analyses of the samples. One of the main findings of the first MSR Sample Planning Group (MSPG, 2019a) states that "The scientific community, for reasons of scientific quality, cost, and timeliness, strongly prefers that as many sample-related investigations as possible be performed in PI-led laboratories outside containment." There are many scientific and technical reasons for this preference, including the ability to utilize advanced and customized instrumentation that may be difficult to reproduce inside in a biocontained facility, and the ability to allow multiple science investigators in different labs to perform similar or complementary analyses to confirm the reproducibility and accuracy of results. It is also reasonable to assume that there will be a desire for the SRF to be as efficient and economical as possible, while still enabling the objectives of MSR to be achieved. For these reasons, MSPG concluded, and MSPG2 agrees, that the SRF should be designed to accommodate only those analytical activities that could not reasonably be done in outside laboratories because they are time- or sterilization-sensitive, are necessary for the Sample Safety Assessment Protocol (SSAP), or are necessary parts of the initial sample characterization process that would allow subsamples to be effectively allocated for investigation. All of this must be accommodated in an SRF, while preserving the scientific value of the samples through maintenance of strict environmental and contamination control standards.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Isabelle Frapart Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, May 20, 2022 - 3:15:10 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 5, 2022 - 9:02:05 AM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License



Brandi Lee Carrier, David Beaty, Aurore Hutzler, Alvin Smith, Gerhard Kminek, et al.. Science and Curation Considerations for the Design of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility. Astrobiology, Mary Ann Liebert, 2022, 22 (1), ⟨10.1089/AST.2021.0110⟩. ⟨hal-03671837⟩



Record views


Files downloads